Roberto Leo
1/5
As a participant in the Level 3 Counselling course at Heartwood(HW) in Nov 2022, it was an unbearableĀ experience with the tutor and the Centre Director(CD) for all the time.
ā¢The CD removed me from the final online sessions spanning the whole month of April 2023. At that time, HW was supposed to investigate what l reported: harassment suffered by another student.
ā¢My tutor said "these are very serious accusations and something that we take very seriously" -"if l wish to report the harasser as having breached the student code of conduct, to do so via email to our CD who will conduct an independent and thorough investigation". l did it but instead of responding appropriately HW allowed the student l reported to continue to join the sessions whilst l was removed.
Hence the tutor and CD did not treat me and the person l reported, EQUALLY.
ā¢Worse the tutor acted towards the harasser with a motherlike affection while there was an investigation going on, this was witnessed by another learner who also provided a witness statement but this was ignored by the management. This was UNprofessional conduct, as we all paid the same amount of money despite l was treated differently. This is discrimination and it is a form of racism.
ā¢The outcome of the investigation was biased. Below the Evidence:
-The HW Scope and Purpose of Breaches to the Student Code of Conduct, states:
ā¢"This procedure applies to all students of the College when they are at the College, placement or event. They also apply when behaviour outside of the College has a detrimental impact on other people attending the College". See the 1st file attached below.
ā¢lt clearly states "When behaviour OUTSIDE of the College has a detrimental impact", but the response from the CD: "Any incident that you have described concerning the other student have taken OUTSIDE of the class / social media and that are separate to HW and out of their control". See the 2nd file attached.
ā¢HW broke their own policy despite l suffered strong detriment due to harassment from that student and the tutor. IMPORTANTLY: this occurred before my withdrawal.
ā¢The injustice,assignments deadlines, the intimidating emails to be excluded from the course caused me depression which forced me to withdraw my complaints.
ā¢l requested to change tutor but instead of supporting me HW excluded me from the sessions. l was unfairly marginalized bcs of my legitimate report!
ā¢l requested a full refund but HW denied that and gaslighted me. HW used my withdrawal, any references to my complaints to not qualify for review within my latest complaint,etc. HW DID NOT FOLLOW THEIR OWN POLICY. Importantly, their negligence caused my withdrawal and their mismanagement occurred before my withdrawal: they willfully misapplied their protocol and deceived me.
ā¢The independent adjudicator sided HW, it overlooked their policy and the evidence l supplied.
⢠Worse: when a tutor refuses to teach to a student that tutor is in breach of contract. THIS IS THE LAW.
ā¢A counseling course is meant to be a safe educational Ā environment and as a registered institution with extensive experience, it was shocking to see HW management handling my reports so poorly. l was singled out for making a complaint about harassment from a fellow student and removed from the sessions, which was clearly not fair and denied a refund as well.
HW management should have demonstrated the application of the ethical framework which was an important part of the program, but they failed to apply the very principles they profess to teach. You do not expect that from an institution that trains professional counsellors.
ā¢The HW comment below says that my review contains a number of inaccuracies? There has been months of email/evidence exchange with HW management from Jan 2023 till June 2024 where l proved HW wrong with more than 20 reports but they want me to sign a disparagement agreement where l cannot leave a negative review and still denying my money back?!
Everything written above is proved by evidence and recorded on my email+witness statement. IT IS ACCURATE.